1. Home
  2. Education
  3. Economics

Your Responses - What do the Economic Indicators Say About Dubya's Chances?

Reader Reaction

By Mike Moffatt, About.com

I received dozens and dozens of e-mails on the article What do the Economic Indicators Say About Dubya's Chances? Equal numbers accused me of being a Republican apologist or a campaigner for the Democrats, so I guess I'm doing my job. One thing I would like to point out is that the original article did not attempt to assign any credit or blame to Bush for those numbers. However it is a truism in politics that incumbents tend to get re-elected when times are good, no matter how much or how little they had to do with it.

Here is a small sampling of the letters I received. If you wish to contact me, you can do so by using the feedback form.

---

In reading your comments regarding the economy and unemployment under President Bush. My perception, is that the economy is not doing well. Part of the reason that production has gone down, is due to the number of jobs that have gone overseas. There is a backlash developing against products from other countries, as more American's lose their jobs to someone overseas. However, it has become very difficult to find some items that are manufactured in the US at all any longer.

The unemployment figures are also misleading, since I understand that they only reflect the people that are collecting unemployment. I was laid off last March, with my entire department. Approximately 3/4s of us have found jobs, those that haven't, will be losing their unemployment in another couple of weeks. After working for the same company 8 years, it is very difficult to find another job paying anywhere close to what I was making, and more companies are not offering benefits, a good indicator that unemployment is high enough, that they don't have to offer benefits to get employees.

My brother is in the Computer industry, and he knows of people that were laid off in 2000 and are still having a problem finding a job that pays half of what they were making in 2000.

---

It seems to me you have taken a selective bit of information to make a broad assumption to try to slant the new against President Bush, as the liberal media does. There are many other indicators that says the economy is doing better and recovering from the 9/11 disaster than you have elected to point out. If you want to do a better job do a much better in depth analysis, and point out the negative factors of a declining economy and the 9/ll event that was not made by President Bush, but to a great extent by lack of action by his predecesor. Also, might point out the good years of the Clinton administration were fueled by actions taken in the first Bush Sr's administration, and not by President Clinton's administration as he and the shallow thinking media would have us believe.

---

Please continue to page 2

Explore Economics

About.com Special Features

A Smarter Future

Tips that will help finance your education, excel in the classroom, and advance your career. More >

How to Ace the GRE

Being well prepared is the first step; here are more essential suggestions. More >

  1. Home
  2. Education
  3. Economics
  4. Taxes, Policy, & Politics
  5. Elections & The Economy
  6. Your Responses - What do the Economic Indicators Say About Dubya's Chances?

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.