[A:] Great question! Let's take a look.
Parkin and Bade's Economics Second Edition defines trade balance as:
- The value of all the goods and services we sell to other countries (exports) minus the value of all the goods and services we buy from foreigners (imports) is called our trade balance
We know from "A Beginner's Guide to Exchange Rates and the Foreign Exchange Market" that changes in exchange rates can greatly impact various parts of the economy. This was later confirmed in "A Beginner's Guide to Purchasing Power Parity Theory" where we saw that a fall in the exchange rates will cause foreigners to buy more of our goods and us to buy less foreign goods. So theory tells us that when the value of the U.S. Dollar falls relative to other currencies, the U.S. should enjoy a trade surplus, or at least a smaller trade deficit.
If we look at the U.S. Balance of trade data, this doesn't seem to be happening. The U.S. Census Bureau keeps extensive data on U.S. trade. The trade deficit does not appear to be getting smaller, as shown by their data. Here is the size of the trade deficit for the twelve months from November 2002 to October 2003.
- Nov. 2002 (38,629)
- Dec. 2002 (42,332)
- Jan. 2003 (40,035)
- Feb. 2003 (38,617)
- Mar. 2003 (42,979)
- Apr. 2003 (41,998)
- May. 2003 (41,800)
- Jun. 2003 (40,386)
- Jul. 2003 (40,467)
- Aug. 2003 (39,605)
- Sep. 2003 (41,341)
- Oct. 2003 (41,773)
- Canada ($371 B)
- Mexico ($232 B)
- Japan ($173 B)
- China ($147 B)
- Germany ($89 B)
- U.K. ($74 B)
- South Korea ($58 B)
- Taiwan ($36 B)
- France ($34 B)
- Malaysia ($26 B)
Next Section: Canadian-American Trade and the Canadian-American Exchange Rate
LIST OF SECTIONS
- Section 1: The Trade Deficit and Exchange Rates
- Section 2: Canadian-American Trade and the Canadian-American Exchange Rate
- Section 3: Mexican-American Trade and the Mexican-American Exchange Rate
- Section 4: Japanese-American Trade and the Japanese-American Exchange Rate
- Section 5: Chinese-American Trade and the Chinese-American Exchange Rate
